<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="aisl.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>

<report>
 <title>Spring 2003 AISL Report</title>
 <division name="Trades and Industry Division">

<course name="Automotive Service Technician Program">
   <section val="1">
      <faculty>Dave Covington </faculty>
      <assessment descr="">
	<descrDataCollected>
		Students are given a copy of a Reader's Digest article called "Can You Fix My Car" 
		and then write a short essay about their analysis of the contents of the article.  
		The article is about a fairly late model car, 1995 Ford Taurus, which has been 
		"bugged" with a simple problem.   The car is then driven across country, stopping 
		at various auto service facilities to determine the level of competence of the 
		mechanics at these facilities.  There are, of course, very competent and extremely 
		incompetent people out there.  Students are required to address such questions as:
		" Who do you think did the best job, and why?", " Who do you think did the worst 
		job and why?", "Would you have done the same, or better than the best?", 
		"How does this article apply to what you have been studying in this course?", and 
		"How would you choose a repair facility if you were on vacation 1000 miles from 
		home in a strange town?"    There are several other similar questions to be 
		addressed in the exercise. 
	</descrDataCollected>
	<data>	
		I have consistently been surprised by the depth of thinking and the ability of 
		most of my students to express themselves on this subject.  They perform much 
		better on this exercise than on most of my essay type questions  on my tests.  
		Perhaps that says something about my test questions. After I read these essays, 
		we have a discussion period wherein I ask them to expand on some of the statements 
		they made in their essay and I try to act as the devil's advocate by challenging 
		some of the ideas,  This does not make me particularly popular, 
		but it does enforce the critical thinking component of the project.
	</data>
	<conclusions>
		This exercise better prepares students to express themselves in writing about 
		something of a technical nature.  This will be necessary on the job, if they 
		advance to a supervisory position.  While I don't have any hard data to support this 
		belief, it stands to reason.  Since this exercise  is done during the later part 
		of the last semester they are in the program, there is no chance to see transfer 
		of learning into other classes.
	</conclusions>
	<changesMadeOrContinued>
		I am working of putting together similar projects 
		in some of the beginning courses and that effort should enable someone 
		to make some comparisons and evaluations.
	</changesMadeOrContinued>
	<resultsFromPriorChanges>
	</resultsFromPriorChanges>
      </assessment>
   </section>
</course>

<course name="Gunsmithing Program">
   <section val="">
      <faculty></faculty>
      <assessment descr="">
	<descrDataCollected>
		<a href="gunsmithing.xls">spreadsheet</a>
	</descrDataCollected>
	<data>
	</data>
	<conclusions>
	</conclusions>
	<changesMadeOrContinued>
	</changesMadeOrContinued>
	<resultsFromPriorChanges>
	</resultsFromPriorChanges>
      </assessment>
   </section>
</course>

 </division>
</report>
