"the attempt at the posterior reconstruction of existence
by the process of conceptualization" A. Einstein, i.e.,
explain, or know, nature by critical thinking
----- Law --- - --- Theory ----- - --- Speculation ---
Newton's Laws - General Relativity - Gravitons
When is a theory scientific?
guided by natural phenomena
ask questions of nature
empirical testability --- consensus
empirical testability --- repeatability
explanatory by reference to natural law
Science for manipulation -- science for understanding
How does a laser work? an atom bomb? ...?
"[W]hat makes the general theory of relativity so important is not
that it can predict planetary motions a shade more accurately than
Newton's theory can. It is that it reveals and explains
previously unsuspected aspects of reality, such as the
curvature of space and time. This is typical of scientific
explanation. Scientific theories explain the objects and
phenomena of our experience in terms of an underlying
reality which we do not experience directly. But the ability
of a theory to explain what we experience is not its most
valuable attribute. Its most valuable attribute is that it
explains the fabric of reality itself."
The Fabric of Reality, David Deutsch, 1998.
Allows and forbids specific outcomes
testable - make "risky" predictions
Logical positivists assert that only empirically verifiable statements have meaning
Carnap, logical empiricist, calls for gradually increasing confirmation
Popper - verification counts only for "risky prediction"
Both fallacies stem from beliefs
extrapolated
outside discipline boundaries
Religious explanations are not necessarily scientific explanations
Just because the supernatural is inaccessible to measurement
does not preclude it from having a reality, only that it
is not the same as "natural" reality
"science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
Albert Einstein