| Analysis of placement of students, Spring 2007 (07S) |
Spring 2007
(07S) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return to Table of Contents |
| Each
instructor was asked to rank students as: |
|
| + |
student was placed too high for
ability |
|
| 0 |
student properly placed |
|
| - |
student was placed too low for
ability |
|
|
| Course |
Too Hi |
0 |
Too Lo |
Ttl |
|
| 30 |
0 |
15 |
2 |
17 |
|
| 60 |
3 |
27 |
2 |
32 |
|
| 90 |
8 |
27 |
1 |
36 |
|
| 106 |
4 |
19 |
0 |
23 |
|
| 107 |
4 |
8 |
0 |
12 |
|
|
19 |
96 |
5 |
120 |
|
|
|
| Course |
Too Hi |
0 |
Too Lo |
|
|
| 30 |
0% |
88% |
12% |
|
|
| 60 |
9% |
84% |
6% |
|
|
| 90 |
22% |
75% |
3% |
|
|
| 106 |
17% |
83% |
0% |
|
|
| 107 |
33% |
67% |
0% |
|
|
|
16% |
79% |
4% |
|
|
| It appears
that the majority of students are being placed into courses appropriate to
their skill level. |
|
| There were
some students (19 out of the 120 enrolled), however, that the instructors
felt were placed |
|
| into
courses that were above their current skill level. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|