| Analysis of placement of students, Fall 2006 (07F) | Return to Table of Contents | ||||||||||||
| Each instructor was asked to rank students as: | |||||||||||||
| + | student was placed too high for ability | ||||||||||||
| 0 | student properly placed | ||||||||||||
| - | student was placed too low for ability | ||||||||||||
| Course | Too Hi | 0 | Too Lo | Ttl | |||||||||
| 30 | 3 | 33 | 5 | 41 | |||||||||
| 60 | 3 | 29 | 4 | 36 | |||||||||
| 90 | 6 | 40 | 1 | 47 | |||||||||
| 106 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 22 | |||||||||
| 107 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 8 | |||||||||
| 15 | 128 | 11 | 154 | ||||||||||
| Course | Too Hi | 0 | Too Lo | ||||||||||
| 30 | 7% | 80% | 12% | ||||||||||
| 60 | 8% | 81% | 11% | ||||||||||
| 90 | 13% | 85% | 2% | ||||||||||
| 106 | 9% | 91% | 0% | ||||||||||
| 107 | 13% | 75% | 13% | ||||||||||
| 10% | 82% | 8% | |||||||||||
| Apparently, most students are being properly placed, with roughly the same number misplaced too high as too low. | |||||||||||||